Hello
brothers.
The
teaching of the US bishops is
very clear--a Catholic should
not consider voting for a pro-abortion
candidate. The mission of CFC-FFL
is very clear--we are for family
and life; our mission is to
renew the family and defend
life. It is very clear that
one of the greatest evils in
the world is abortion. No renewed
Christian should show approval
of abortion by voting for a
clearly and vigorously pro-abortion
candidate.
It
is inconceivable that any of our
members in CFC-FFL, or any renewed
Catholic for that matter, would
vote for staunchly pro-abortion
candidates (especially when there
are very pro-life candidates available).
They would be taking the side
of evil and would be against Christ
himself.
Please
take steps to inform and educate
our members, especially our young
brethren, about life and the Church's
clear stand, and how all these
impact on the US elections.
God
bless you all. God bless America.
frank
Bishop
Vasa: Pro-Abortion Candidates
are "Disqualified" -
Clarifies "Faithful Citizenship"
By
John-Henry Westen
CHARLOTTE, North Carolina, September
12, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) -
During the opening day of the
Catholic Leadership Conference
yesterday, Baker Oregon Bishop
Robert Vasa clarified the teaching
of the US Bishops Conference regarding
voting in favor of pro-abortion
politicians. The question of whether
Catholics may remain in good standing
with the Church while voting for
pro-abortion politicians was raised.
Bishop Vasa responded referencing
the document of the United States
Catholic Conference titled "Faithful
Citizenship", noting
a pro-abortion stance disqualifies
candidates from consideration
by faithful Catholics.
LifeSiteNews.com
spoke with Bishop Vasa after the
session. Describing the deliberation
among US bishops over the "Faithful
Citizenship" document, he
said: "When we were working
on the document 'Faithful Citizenship',
and the issue of whether or not
a person's adamant pro-abortion
position was a disqualifying condition,
the general sense was 'yes that
is a disqualifying condition'."
However, during the discussions
mention was made of the document
by Pope Benedict just prior his
elevation to the pontificate which
noted that Catholics may in good
conscience vote for a politician
who supports abortion in the presence
of "proportionate reasons."
Bishop Vasa explained the notion
of proportionate reasons, saying,
"The conditions under which
an individual may be able to vote
for a pro-abortion candidate would
apply only if all the candidates
are equally pro-abortion."
He added: "And then you begin
to screen for the other issues
and make a conscientious decision
to vote for this pro-abortion
candidate because his positions
on these other issues are more
in keeping with good Catholic
values." In that case, he
said, "It doesn't mean that
you in any way support or endorse
a pro-abortion position but you
take a look in that context at
the lesser of two evils."
Speaking of politicians with a
pro-abortion stand he said, "When
we have someone who has that stand
on a disqualifying issue, then
the other issues, in many ways,
do not matter because they are
already wrong on that absolutely
fundamental issue."
Only when taken to a level of
insanity could a 'pro-war' candidate
be considered on par with a pro-abortion
candidate in the Bishop's view.
"If we had a candidate in
favor of a war in Iraq in which
we decimate the entire population
and we kill as many civilians
to impose as much terror on everybody
as possible to make sure . . .
If that was in opposition to a
pro-abortion person then I'd have
a real conflict of conscience
because you'd have a direct and
intentional killing of innocent
persons on one hand and the direct
and intentional killing of persons
on the other hand, said the Baker
Bishop.
"But we don't have that issue
with capital punishment, we don't
have that issue with the war in
Iraq we don't have that issue
with the present Administration,"
he added.
Bishop Vasa explained that as
a man from the Midwest, the analogy
of a combine worked well to describe
how a sifting of candidates could
be undertaken. He described a
combine as having a series of
sieves, the first of which eliminates
the largest and most obvious refuse.
In the analogy the first screen
would eliminate
pro-abortion candidates, "to
weed out the greatest evil,"
he said.
He concluded saying, "Abortion
needs to be in our country a defining
issue and we ought not be afraid
to make it a defining issue because
when we do that we will have an
end of abortion in this country."
"For
to me life is Christ, and death
is gain." (Phil 1:21)
|