PROCLAIMING JESUS CHRIST
THROUGH CYBER-EVANGELIZATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
CFC-FFL
Territorial and Ministerial Governance
CFC-FFL
is an evangelistic and missionary community. Everything
it does is about evangelization. It accomplishes its evangelistic
work through a territorial structure utilizing programs
formulated by three basic ministries—Family Ministries,
Social Ministries and Pro-Life. According to its pastoral
structure, there is governance at different levels. Further,
there is territorial governance, and there is ministerial
governance. Both territorial and ministerial intersect,
resulting in one overall integrated work of evangelization.
What
is territorial governance?
Territorial
governance refers to leadership and administration over
the CFC-FFL group in a particular geographic subdivision
or territory (country, diocese, vicariate, parish). It involves
the handling of both the life and service of all members.
It is a pyramidal authority structure. From the top down,
territorial governance has the following levels1
:
Servant
General
MetroManila/Luzon/Visayas/Mindanao/International Mission
Coordinators
Country Servant (for Int’l)
Regional Coordinators (for Int’l)
Country Coordinators (for Int’l)
Region Coordinators (except for MM)
Area Coordinators
District Servants
Cluster Servants
Chapter Servants
Unit Servants
Household Servants
The
task of territorial leaders is to govern and oversee the
life and mission of CFC-FFL, in all its different and diverse
aspects.
What
is ministerial governance?
Ministerial
governance refers to leadership for a particular aspect
of the life and mission of CFC-FFL. It involves the handling
of the personnel or staff assigned to the ministries (Family,
Social, Pro-Life). These ministries can have sub-ministries
under them. From the top down, ministerial governance has
the following levels:
(Ministry)
Int’l Coordinator
National Coordinator (for Int’l)
District Coordinator
Cluster Coordinator
Chapter Coordinator
The
task of ministerial governance is to take the lead in the
furtherance of its particular aspect of the life and mission
of CFC-FFL. As such, it formulates programs and pushes for
their implementation while guiding and overseeing the actions
and conduct of the ministry. These programs and activities
are meant to enhance and move forward the evangelistic thrust
according to its particular focus (family, social, pro-life).
The ministries are the visionaries and “experts”
in their field and have a singular focus on their area of
responsibility.
How
do the two intersect?
The
territorial and ministerial must come together as one integral
work. However, because their tasks and focus are different2,
then there is a need for coordination3.
Following
are basic principles:
| 1) |
Both
territorial and ministerial, comprising the one integral
work of CFC-FFL, are equally important. One is not
subordinate in importance to the other. The ministries
are the visionaries and experts, and they are focused,
and it is right for them to push for their advocacies,
according to their mandate. On the other hand, the
territorial looks to the overall picture, including
the availability of resources, and ensures that the
community is not overly burdened or set off track
from its mission. |
|
| 2) |
The
ministerial proposes, while the territorial disposes.
That is, the ministries push for their direction and
programs, but it is the territorial that decides on
implementation. This is for good order. However, while
approval for action or implementation is vested in
the territorial, it must be clarified that the ministerial
does not just cook up programs to be approved or rejected,
but the ministerial seeks to push its agenda according
to its mandate. |
|
| 3) |
So
in case the territorial rejects the implementation
of an action or program the ministerial is pushing,
it is right for the ministerial to insist (in a good
way of course), if need be, and in case there is still
no acceptance, the ministerial can appeal to the next
higher level of authority for decision. |
|
| 4) |
The
challenge will be to work as a team, appreciating
each other’s particular anointing and seeing
how God might be using the other. This is where servant
leadership becomes crucial. Thus it will not be about
power or turf or having one’s own way, but about
how we can best serve God, together with all the other
seniors that form one body doing the one mission,
but with various facets. |
|
| 5) |
Both
territorial and ministerial should have only the one
interest of the whole CFC at heart. Territorial leadership
must not neglect the well-being of any ministry. Ministerial
leadership must not think only of its own ministry’s
well-being but also look to the larger good. |
|
Functional
relationship to each other
The
functions of the territorial leadership are as follows:
1) |
Ensure
implementation of approved programs along the life
and mission of CFC-FFL. |
|
2) |
Have
a regular service/reportorial meeting with the heads
of the various ministries. |
|
3) |
Integrate
activities of the ministries in its annual calendar.
Take the initiative in working out schedule conflicts.
|
|
4) |
Assign people for service in the ministries. Look
for eager and passionate servants, and avoid a “left-over”
mentality, i.e., assigning leaders not from among
the best available, or not giving adequate priority
to ministry activities including funding. After considering
the inputs of the ministry leadership, it is the territorial
leadership that decides on final service assignments. |
|
5) |
Consult
with the ministry leadership before making any changes
in the leadership of the ministries. |
|
The
functions of the ministry leadership are as follows:
1) |
Formulate
its programs in consultation and active collaboration
with the territorial leadership. |
|
2) |
Work
out its annual schedule and activities, and submit
these for approval by the territorial leadership. |
|
3) |
Look
for its key personnel and recommend them for approval
by the territorial leadership. If the territorial
leadership does not approve of a choice of the ministerial
leadership, the latter can elevate the matter to a
higher authority for decision. |
|
4) |
Coordinate
and clear with the territorial leadership the sending
of leaders or resource persons from outside the territory
for ministry activities. |
|
5) |
Propose
its annual budget for approval by the territorial
leadership, and propose certain expenditures as needed
from time to time. |
|
| 6) |
Make
regular reports of its activities to the territorial
leadership. |
|
Practical
aspects
1)
|
All
are subject to the direct authority of the territorial
leadership. This is a pastoral and governmental relationship,
which includes their life and service. On the other
hand, those assigned to the ministries are also subject
to the authority of the ministerial leadership but
with regard to their specific service in the ministry. |
|
| 2)
|
Ministry
coordinators should not implement any program or
activity without the express approval of the territorial
leadership.
|
|
Service
structure
In
accordance with territorial governance, there is a solid-line
authority structure as follows:
1)
|
Under
the Servant General are the International Coordinators
for Family Ministries, Social Ministries and Pro-Life
Ministry. |
|
2)
|
Under
the District Servant are his Cluster Servants and
the Family Ministries District Coordinator (DC), Social
Ministries DC, and Pro-Life DC. |
|
3)
|
Under
the Family Ministries District Coordinator are the
KFL, YFL, SFL, HFL and SvFL District Coordinators
(apply to SocMin and Pro-Life as appropriate).
|
|
4)
|
Under
the Cluster Servant are his Chapter Servants and the
Cluster Coordinators for KFL, YFL, SFL, HFL and SvFL.
|
|
| 5)
|
Under
the Chapter Servant are his Unit Servants and the
Chapter Coordinators of KFL and YFL and the Chapter
Servants of SFL, HFL and SvFL.
|
|
In
accordance with ministerial governance, there is a dotted-line
authority structure as follows:
1)
|
Under
the Family Ministries International Coordinator (FMIC)
are the International Coordinators for KFL, YFL, SFL,
HFL and SvFL. The FMIC is assisted by the Young Ministries
Coordinator for yCFC, KFL, YFL and SFL (apply to SocMin
and Pro-Life as appropriate). |
|
2)
|
Under
the International Coordinators are the National Coordinators. |
|
3)
|
Under
the National Coordinators are the Regional Coordinators. |
|
4)
|
Under
the Regional Coordinators are the District Coordinators. |
|
5)
|
Under
the District Coordinators are the Cluster Coordinators. |
|
The
exception to the rule
It
has been said that the Ministries (Family, Social and Pro-Life)
function as staff. However, the Ministries can also have
their own operational functions as the need arises. Examples
of these are:
1)
|
Morning
Star schools run by EFI. |
|
2)
|
Outreach
to Indigenous Peoples run by EFI. |
|
3)
|
Legislative
advocacy by Pro-Life. |
|
In
these, the Social Ministry leads, while drawing support
from the membership and territorial leadership.
The
approval for such initiatives is subject to the SG.
The
role of fulltime pastoral workers
Among
other things, the fulltime pastoral worker (FTW):
| 1)
|
Will
be the point person when cascading the ministry programs
into the district (District Servants should determine
which ones are relevant or need to be prioritized). |
|
2)
|
Will
bring with him/her a host of activities that support
the programs, but will coordinate at the district
level on which of these are suited to the needs. |
|
3)
|
Will
be invited to attend district meetings, and will be
involved in ensuring ministry events/activities are
communicated and supported, while district/cluster/chapter
events are also noted, so schedules are in synch and
participation is maximized. |
|
| 4)
|
Will
coordinate closely with the FamMin/SocMin/Pro-Life
Coordinator of the district to ensure that all communications
directed through both the District Servants and
Chapter Coordinators pertaining to the programs
and activities are known and any gaps are closed.
|
|
A
note on being parish-based
CFC-FFL
seeks to establish itself in the parishes and dioceses and
be a servant to the Church. At times the parish will have
its own programs and priorities, while CFC-FFL has its own
basic charism, mission and programs. What if there is a
conflict?
Our
guiding principles, as CFC-FFL, ought to be as follows:
| 1)
|
We
seek to serve the parish or diocese according to our
particular charism. As such, we should proactively
offer our programs. |
|
2)
|
If
the parish priest or bishop desires us to serve in
a way that is not part of our current programs, then
we should consider this. This is then studied by both
the ministerial and territorial in order to come up
with a mutually acceptable program. |
|
A
note on households
The
territorial and ministerial governance relates to service.
But part of the pastoral structure is the existence of households.
These are pastoral groups intended to support and enhance
the spiritual life of members. Every CFC-FFL member belongs
to a household for personal pastoral support.
Households
are different from service groupings, though at times the
two might intersect. Households are formed by bringing people
together who can help enhance each other’s spiritual
growth, while service groups concern themselves with the
conduct of one’s service. Households should not normally
be formed just according to service groupings.
Attachments
To
clarify the inter-relationships more, the following attachments
are provided:
1)
|
Pastoral-organizational
structure |
|
2)
|
Service
structure |
|
1
Certain levels may not be required in a given territory
because of size of membership, so it is not necessary that
all these levels exist everywhere.
2 Though both are always in line with the overall
vision and mission of CFC-FFL, and enhance the basic thrust
of evangelization.
3 Tension may come, as each looks to its own
responsibilities. Such tension is not necessarily bad, as
it can result in different points-of-view and even contrary
opinions coming together to result in a better thought-out,
discussed and discerned decision or action.
Approved. Dec 4, 2008
Revisited June 17, 2009
|
|
|
|