COUPLES FOR CHRIST
FOUNDATION FOR FAMILY AND LIFE
STEWARDSHIP OF FUNDS
The
work of CFC-FFL is funded through the tithes and contributions
of members. All money given to CFC-FFL belongs to the Lord
and is managed for him by CFC-FFL in order to further his
work. CFC-FFL in turn is one community throughout the world.
As such, stewardship over all money given to CFC-FFL is
entrusted to the community as represented by its overall
leadership.
There
are different levels of “overall” leadership.
The first and highest level is the Servant General, who
is steward for all money given to CFC-FFL throughout the
world. A second level is the highest leadership in a particular
country, who is the Country Servant, who acts as steward
for all money given to CFC-FFL in that particular country.
A third level is the highest leadership in a particular
area (i.e., province, state, or other political subdivision
of a country), who is the Area Servant, who acts as steward
for all money given by members to CFC-FFL in that particular
area.
One
fund system
CFC-FFL
uses a “one fund” system in handling the Lord’s
money. Its most basic meaning is that all the money of CFC-FFL
throughout the world is one fund. This is simply consistent
with the reality that CFC-FFL is one community worldwide,
united by the one vision, mission and culture, doing the
one work of the Lord, and under one overall leadership with
its center in Manila under the Servant General.
However,
for practical and pastoral reasons, the funds of different
CFC-FFL groups throughout the world are handled separately.
Thus the one-fund system is applied on a localized basis.
Internationally,
one fund would normally refer to all the money of CFC-FFL
within a particular country, or in the case of certain countries
(where the different area groups have not yet been “unified”),
to all the money of CFC-FFL within a particular area. Thus
the different CFC-FFL country groups (or in some cases the
different CFC-FFL area groups) would handle their money
“independently” of each other. The national
leadership (or in some cases the area leadership) would
determine how to use CFC-FFL funds.
Within
a particular country, all the money of CFC-FFL is considered
one fund, under the stewardship of the national leadership
under the Country Servant. However, the funds of different
areas (e.g., provinces, states) are normally handled “independently”
of each other. The area leadership under the Area Servant
would determine how to use CFC-FFL funds, and would report
to the national leadership and have their financial accounts
integrated with the national accounts. However, the national
leadership, in exercising its overall stewardship, may direct
the local areas on how to use CFC-FFL funds.
Within
a particular area, all the money contributed by members
is given, as a general rule, to the one central fund. No
chapter, which is the pastoral subdivision of the larger
CFC-FFL community, should maintain its own funds. Neither
should the cluster or district. It is the overall area leadership
that determines how funds are used. All chapters remit collections,
and in turn look to the central fund to provide for the
money needed for official activities. This ensures that
we pursue the interest and priorities of the whole CFC-FFL
rather than just that of some chapters.
The
one-fund system also means that the different CFC-FFL family
ministries do not maintain their own funds, but rather give
in their contributions to the CFC-FFL central fund and draw
expenses from there.
Chapter
funds
Now
the above is the general rule. However, it would be impractical
for every chapter to go to the central fund for every expense,
no matter how small. Furthermore, there could be some chapter
activities that the chapter leadership would find beneficial
for members, but which are not essential to our life and
mission and so would not be funded by CFC-FFL.
Thus,
it is possible (though not necessary) for a chapter to maintain
some money under chapter stewardship, for the following
purposes:
| 1. |
|
For
petty cash expenses. |
| 2. |
|
For
certain chapter activities not mandated by the overall
leadership and thus not correspondingly funded (e.g.,
chapter socials). |
| 3. |
|
For
financial needs of chapter members. |
For
the above, a chapter can have the following funding sources:
|
1. |
|
Collections
during Mass (less stipend to the priest). |
2. |
|
Discount
on official novelty items sold by the chapter. |
|
3. |
|
Commissions given as incentive for certain activities
(e.g., solicitation of ads for anniversary souvenir
programs). |
|
4. |
|
Fundraising
within the chapter for specific purposes (e.g., youth
sell food to generate funds for Youth Camp). |
5. |
|
Direct
contributions to the chapter fund by chapter members. |
Regarding
contributions by members to the chapter fund, the following
principles are to be observed:
|
1. |
|
Such
contributions should ideally be over and above one’s
tithes (A “tithe” by definition is 10%
of one’s income). Thus a chapter member should
not deprive the central fund of his contribution in
order to give to the chapter fund. |
2. |
|
Such
contributions should not be given or solicited on
a regular basis if there is no current need. |
3. |
|
The
chapter should not solicit funds if it already has
more than enough on hand to meet the current need. |
4. |
|
The chapter should not keep a sizeable amount in its
chapter fund, beyond its reasonable and foreseen needs
for the near future, and should turn over any excess
to the central fund. |
5. |
|
At
the end of the fiscal year, prior to a major reorganization
where new chapters are set up, any remaining chapter
funds should be turned over to the central fund (this
prevents any disagreement on how to allocate funds
to old and new chapters).
|
Districts may also have a district fund per the above guidelines.
Funding
for formation
CFC-FFL
does not charge any fee for any of its formation courses,
which are given free for all members. Even charges for MERs
are not income for CFC-FFL but are intended to cover costs
involved (venue and food). No CFC-FFL member is to be deprived
of attendance at any formation course due to lack of money
to pay the fees involved. How then do we handle the situation
of members not able to afford fees for certain formation
courses (e.g., MER)?
Following
is the suggested progression:
1. |
|
The
chapter should strive to pay such fees from its chapter
fund. |
2. |
|
If
not sufficient, the chapter may solicit contributions
from its members for this particular purpose. |
| 3. |
|
If still lacking, the chapter may approach the cluster
or district for assistance in soliciting contributions
from cluster or district members. |
4.
|
|
Finally,
the chapter may approach the area leadership for subsidy
from the central fund. This should only be resorted
to after exhausting possibilities from the first three. |
For
those who cannot afford to pay, it is a good idea for the
chapter to work out a scheme whereby they repay the amount
subsidized by installment, to the extent that they can afford
without overburdening them. Such installment payments go
to the chapter fund.
(SG. Dec 22, 2010)